Reg Monitoring MCP¶
A regulated business does not miss a rule because the rule was secret. It misses the rule because nobody had the time to read twenty regulators in eleven languages on the week it landed.
Server type: Remote (Streamable HTTP)
Endpoint: https://mcp.regmonitoring.com/mcp
Auth: none, no key and no account
Tools: 7 measured
Corpus: 6,107 records, 34 regulators, 20 jurisdictions
Registry: com.regmonitoring/regulatory-updates
Data to: 2026-10-30
What it does¶
The server is a search index over financial regulation with three things bolted onto it that most regulator feeds do not have: an AI analysis per record, a parsed deadline where one exists, and structured penalty data on the enforcement side.
The seven tools split along that shape.
| Tool | What it answers |
|---|---|
regmonitoring_search_updates |
Updates by any combination of filters. The starting tool. |
regmonitoring_get_update |
One update in full, with the analysis, what changed, who it applies to. |
regmonitoring_list_deadlines |
Consultation response dates, compliance deadlines and rule effective dates. |
regmonitoring_search_enforcement |
Enforcement actions across regulators, with penalty amounts where parsed. |
regmonitoring_get_taxonomy |
Every valid filter value with its record count. |
regmonitoring_get_stats |
Corpus coverage and the date range. |
regmonitoring_get_monthly_briefing |
An editor-written monthly round-up. |
Filters are exact and case-sensitive, and get_taxonomy is what makes them usable: it returns jurisdiction codes with counts (United Kingdom 1,196, United States 996, France 690, Luxembourg 648, Australia 358, Ireland 322, Germany 296, European Union 295, United Arab Emirates 187, Singapore 183, Hong Kong 179) and regulator codes with counts (FCA 797, AMF 690, CSSF 648, SEC 394, ASIC 358, Central Bank of Ireland 322, BaFin next). A search record carries id, title, summary, regulator, jurisdiction, content_type, significance_score from 1 to 5, published_date, deadline_date, has_analysis, a url on regmonitoring.com and the source_url on the regulator's own site.
What this pass measured¶
A keyless JSON-RPC session against https://mcp.regmonitoring.com/mcp returned HTTP 200 on initialize, issued an mcp-session-id header, reported serverInfo regmonitoring 0.2.0, and listed 7 tools. Nothing was gated, so this is a measured surface rather than a vendor claim.
get_stats answered with 6,107 records published between 2011-06-28 and 2026-10-30, 34 regulators with content across 20 jurisdictions, of which 5,528 carry an AI analysis, 974 carry a deadline date, 100 carry a penalty amount, 6,106 carry a significance score and 3,932 carry an urgency flag.
search_updates returned the newest records with pagination fields (total_matching, returned, offset, has_more, next_offset) and real rows: an SEC speech at the Economic Club of Dallas published 2026-10-30 with significance 2, SEC exemptive relief from Treasury clearing requirements for certain inter-affiliate and non-US repo transactions published the same day at significance 5 with a deadline of 2026-12-31, and an SEC enforcement action against United Planners with a deadline of 2026-11-29.
list_deadlines returned 974 matching deadlines, each with a deadline_type (the sample was response_due), a status (passed on the sample), a confidence value (medium), the sentence the date was parsed from, and a firm_types list such as Broker Dealer, Wealth Manager and Bank. That last field is the one that turns a feed into a work queue for a specific business.
Where it sits in this catalogue¶
The Bot Wire MCP is the closest neighbour and it is a different instrument. It reads primary documents from US and EU sources: SEC EDGAR filings, the Federal Register, federal court opinions, congressional bills, SEC and FTC enforcement, DOJ announcements, FDA approvals, Federal Reserve and FOMC statements, ECB releases, BLS and BEA data and CISA vulnerabilities. It is a wire service for original documents, and its guide carries no jurisdiction filter, no consultation deadline and no cross-regulator index.
Reg Monitoring is the layer above that: it is an index about regulators rather than a pipe into one country's filings. Its weight sits outside the United States, where UK, French, Luxembourg, Irish, German, Australian, Singapore and Hong Kong records together outnumber the US ones, and its two distinguishing fields are the deadline list and the firm-type filter. A UK payments firm asking "what consultations close in the next sixty days that apply to us" gets an answer here and does not get one from Bot Wire.
Lawstronaut MCP covers structured legal research, and AdvisorIQ MCP covers US advisor continuing education deadlines. Neither indexes regulator publications across jurisdictions.
What this pass did not establish¶
The corpus is as current as 2026-10-30, so a user reading it days later should treat the newest week as a gap until the next refresh. The deadline dates are parsed rather than published as a field by the regulator, and the sample returned confidence: medium with the source sentence attached, so a deadline should be read with its confidence and its context sentence, not as a bare date. Only 100 of 6,107 records carry a parsed penalty amount, so enforcement sums are frequently missing rather than zero. The analysis text is vendor-written and this pass read its existence and its field, not its accuracy against the source document. Nothing here is legal advice, and the server does not filter by the query author's own licence or jurisdiction.
FAQ¶
Is it free?¶
Yes. No key, no account, no per-call price. The endpoint answered a keyless initialize with HTTP 200 and listed its tools without a credential.
How is it different from reading the Federal Register or the SEC site?¶
Those are two sources in one country. This is an index across 34 regulators in 20 jurisdictions with an analysis layer, a parsed deadline and a firm-type filter that no single regulator publishes.
Can an agent answer "which rules affect a UK payments firm this quarter"?¶
That is the shape the filters support: jurisdiction uk, regulator fca, plus topic, sector and firm type, with list_deadlines supplying the dates. get_taxonomy returns the exact values to send, since filters are case-sensitive.
How current is it?¶
The corpus reported data current to 2026-10-30 with 6,107 records going back to 2011-06-28. Treat the newest days as a rolling gap.
Does it replace a compliance officer?¶
No. It replaces the manual sweep of regulator websites. The deadline confidence field and the attached context sentence exist precisely because a parsed date is a lead to verify, not a determination.
Integration with CorpusIQ¶
CorpusIQ is the connector layer that lets AI assistants read the systems a business already runs on - accounting, payments, CRM, email, files and analytics - and answer with the source named. It is read-only by design: it retrieves data and never writes to, or acts in, a connected system, which is what makes it safe to point at live accounts.
This page is part of the CorpusIQ directory, the reference we maintain for the MCP server and agent-skill ecosystem. Run alongside CorpusIQ, a third-party server like this one can be combined with a company's own business data in a single answer.
See Also¶
- External MCP Server Catalog - the full catalogue this entry belongs to
- The Bot Wire MCP - Integration Guide - primary-source US and EU documents rather than an index across regulators
- Lawstronaut MCP - Integration Guide - structured legal research beside the regulatory feed